Fail Fast on Configurable Limit Size

Oct 13, 2025 by pinkandtrash.com 142 views

Background

In the context of our system, we are constantly evolving to accommodate larger transactions while ensuring that these transactions adhere to specific limits and types. This story focuses on implementing validations to guarantee that the transactions we process meet these requirements. As we introduce the capability to handle bigger transactions, it is crucial to verify that they do not exceed certain size limits and are of the correct type.

Acceptance Criteria

To ensure that our ingest workflow checks are comprehensive and effective, we have established the following acceptance criteria:

1. Fail Fast on Configurable Limit Size

We will add a validation in the parseAndCheck method to immediately fail if the transaction size exceeds the configurable limit size. This validation will be a critical component in preventing oversized transactions from being processed.

2. Verify Transaction Type

To ensure that we are processing the correct type of transactions, we will add a check to verify that the transaction type is indeed EthereumTransaction. This will help us maintain the integrity of our system and prevent potential errors.

3. Validate Ethereum Data Fields

We will also add a check to verify that the ethereum_data fields are within the specified limit. This validation will help us prevent data overflow and ensure that our system can process transactions efficiently.

Dependencies

To complete this story, we will rely on the following dependencies:

1. Jumbo Transaction Configuration

We will need to reference the story that introduces the jumbo transaction configuration, which has not been created yet. Once this configuration is in place, we can proceed with implementing the ingest workflow checks.

Definition of Ready (DoR) Checklist

Before we begin working on this story, we need to ensure that we have met the following criteria:

1. Clear Acceptance Criteria

We have clearly defined the acceptance criteria for this story, which includes adding validations to the parseAndCheck method, verifying the transaction type, and validating the ethereum_data fields.

2. Clear and Detailed Description

We have provided a detailed description of the story, including the background, acceptance criteria, and dependencies.

3. Dependencies Identified

We have identified the dependencies required to complete this story, including the jumbo transaction configuration.

4. Links to Documentation

We will need to provide links to relevant documentation to ensure that our implementation is accurate and up-to-date.

5. Should be Completable in 2-3 Days

We estimate that this story can be completed within 2-3 days, assuming that we have met the other criteria.

6. Initial Draft of Low-Level Design Document

We have created an initial draft of the low-level design document, which outlines the technical details of the implementation.

7. At Least High-Level Test Plan

We have developed a high-level test plan to ensure that our implementation is thoroughly tested and meets the acceptance criteria.

8. Groomed/Estimated

We have estimated the effort required to complete this story and have prioritized it accordingly.

Definition of Done (DoD) Checklist

Once we have completed this story, we will ensure that we have met the following criteria:

1. Acceptance Criteria Complete

We will verify that all acceptance criteria have been met, including the addition of validations to the parseAndCheck method, verification of the transaction type, and validation of the ethereum_data fields.

2. No Codacy Issues Greater than Minor

We will ensure that there are no Codacy issues greater than minor in the new code, which will help us maintain the quality and reliability of our system.

3. JavaDocs Updated/Created

We will update or create JavaDocs to ensure that our implementation is well-documented and easy to understand.

4. Code Commented

We will add comments to the code to provide additional context and ensure that our implementation is maintainable.

5. Unit Tests Created/Updated

We will create or update unit tests to ensure that our implementation is thoroughly tested and meets the acceptance criteria.

6. 80% Test Code Coverage

We will aim to achieve 80% test code coverage in the new code, which will help us ensure that our implementation is robust and reliable.

7. Happy Path and Major Negative Cases in HAPI Tests

We will ensure that our HAPI tests cover both the happy path and major negative cases, which will help us identify and fix potential issues early on.

Q: What is the purpose of adding ingest workflow checks?

A: The primary goal of adding ingest workflow checks is to ensure that transactions are processed efficiently and reliably. By implementing these checks, we can prevent oversized transactions from being processed, verify that transactions are of the correct type, and validate the ethereum_data fields to prevent data overflow.

Q: Why is it essential to verify the transaction type?

A: Verifying the transaction type is crucial to ensure that we are processing the correct type of transactions. This helps maintain the integrity of our system and prevents potential errors.

Q: What is the significance of validating the `ethereum_data` fields?

A: Validating the ethereum_data fields is essential to prevent data overflow and ensure that our system can process transactions efficiently. By checking that these fields are within the specified limit, we can prevent potential issues and maintain the reliability of our system.

Q: How will the ingest workflow checks be implemented?

A: The ingest workflow checks will be implemented by adding validations to the parseAndCheck method. This will involve checking that the transaction size does not exceed the configurable limit size, verifying that the transaction type is EthereumTransaction, and validating the ethereum_data fields.

Q: What are the dependencies required to complete this story?

A: The dependencies required to complete this story include the jumbo transaction configuration, which has not been created yet. Once this configuration is in place, we can proceed with implementing the ingest workflow checks.

Q: How will the implementation be tested?

A: The implementation will be tested using unit tests and HAPI tests. We will aim to achieve 80% test code coverage in the new code and ensure that our HAPI tests cover both the happy path and major negative cases.

Q: What is the estimated time required to complete this story?

A: We estimate that this story can be completed within 2-3 days, assuming that we have met the other criteria.

Q: What is the expected outcome of this story?

A: The expected outcome of this story is that we will have implemented comprehensive ingest workflow checks that ensure transactions are processed efficiently and reliably. This will help maintain the integrity of our system and prevent potential errors.

Q: How will the success of this story be measured?

A: The success of this story will be measured by verifying that all acceptance criteria have been met, including the addition of validations to the parseAndCheck method, verification of the transaction type, and validation of the ethereum_data fields. We will also ensure that there are no Codacy issues greater than minor in the new code and that our implementation is well-documented and maintainable.

By addressing these frequently asked questions, we can provide a clear understanding of the purpose and implementation of the ingest workflow checks, as well as the expected outcome and success criteria for this story.