Implications for Education and Practice

Oct 13, 2025 by pinkandtrash.com 76 views

Knowledge of Clinical Registrar Students About Dental Anomalies through Radiography at USU FKG

Understanding Dental Anomalies in the Modern Era

In the ever-evolving field of dentistry, the importance of understanding dental anomalies cannot be overstated. Dental anomalies refer to conditions that deviate from normal development, which can significantly impact one's dental and oral health. As the field of dentistry continues to advance, it is essential to examine the knowledge of clinical registrar students regarding dental anomalies using radiography techniques. This study aims to investigate the knowledge of clinical registrar students at the Faculty of Dentistry, University of North Sumatra (FKG USU) on dental anomalies using dentistry radiographic techniques.

Research Methodology

The research conducted in this study is a descriptive study with a cross-sectional approach. A total of 120 clinical registrar students who had undergone a referral process to carry out dentistry radiography in the context of dental care were selected as the samples. The sampling method used was simple random sampling, which provided an equal opportunity for every student to be involved in this study.

Research Results

The results of the study show that the knowledge of clinical registrar students regarding dental anomalies varies. The most widely known tooth anomaly by students is mesiodens, with a percentage of 65.8%. Other anomalies such as Gemination and Taurodonsia recorded 64.2%. The knowledge of other dental anomalies is also identified, where macrodonsia reaches 60%, microdonsia 58.3%, and fusion 54.2%. Other identified anomalies include transposition (53.3%), Concrescence (53.3%), Dilaceration (52.5%), and Dens in Dente with a percentage of 44.2%.

Analysis and Conclusion

From the results of this study, it can be seen that the knowledge of clinical registrar students regarding the picture of the anomaly of teeth using radiography is quite good, with a good category reaching 57.5%. Meanwhile, the medium and less category amounted to 39.2% and 3.3% each. This shows that most students have an adequate understanding of dental anomalies, but there is still room for improvement.

The importance of mastery of knowledge about dental anomalies does not only have an impact on the quality of treatment given, but also closely related to the right diagnosis and further action in dental practice. Therefore, educational institutions such as USU FKG need to strengthen the curriculum related to radiography and handling of dental anomalies, both through theory and field practice.

Implications for Education and Practice

As a further step, it is recommended that routine training and seminars on the latest developments in the fields of radiography and dental anomalies be conducted. This can help students to better understand and recognize various types of dental anomalies in more depth, which will ultimately improve their abilities in clinical practice.

Limitations and Future Directions

This study has several limitations, including the small sample size and the use of a single sampling method. Future studies should aim to recruit a larger sample size and use multiple sampling methods to increase the generalizability of the results. Additionally, future studies should investigate the impact of educational interventions on the knowledge and skills of clinical registrar students regarding dental anomalies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the knowledge of clinical registrar students regarding dental anomalies using radiography techniques. The results of this study highlight the importance of strengthening the curriculum related to radiography and handling of dental anomalies in educational institutions. By doing so, students can develop a deeper understanding of dental anomalies and improve their abilities in clinical practice.

Recommendations for Future Research

Future research should aim to investigate the impact of educational interventions on the knowledge and skills of clinical registrar students regarding dental anomalies. Additionally, future studies should investigate the use of radiography in the diagnosis and treatment of dental anomalies in clinical practice.

Implications for Clinical Practice

The results of this study have several implications for clinical practice. Firstly, the importance of mastery of knowledge about dental anomalies should be emphasized in clinical practice. Secondly, the use of radiography in the diagnosis and treatment of dental anomalies should be encouraged. Finally, the need for routine training and seminars on the latest developments in the fields of radiography and dental anomalies should be recognized.

Conclusion

Q: What is a dental anomaly?

A: A dental anomaly is a condition that deviates from normal development, which can affect one's dental and oral health. Dental anomalies can be caused by various factors, including genetic, environmental, and traumatic factors.

Q: What are the most common types of dental anomalies?

A: The most common types of dental anomalies include mesiodens, Gemination, Taurodonsia, macrodonsia, microdonsia, fusion, transposition, Concrescence, Dilaceration, and Dens in Dente.

Q: What is the importance of radiography in diagnosing dental anomalies?

A: Radiography is a crucial tool in diagnosing dental anomalies. It allows dentists to visualize the internal structure of the teeth and detect any abnormalities that may be present.

Q: How can radiography help in treating dental anomalies?

A: Radiography can help in treating dental anomalies by allowing dentists to visualize the extent of the anomaly and plan the most effective treatment approach. It can also help in monitoring the progress of treatment and detecting any complications that may arise.

Q: What are the benefits of educating students about dental anomalies and radiography?

A: Educating students about dental anomalies and radiography can help them develop a deeper understanding of the subject and improve their abilities in clinical practice. It can also help them to better diagnose and treat dental anomalies, which can ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The limitations of this study include the small sample size and the use of a single sampling method. Future studies should aim to recruit a larger sample size and use multiple sampling methods to increase the generalizability of the results.

Q: What are the implications of this study for clinical practice?

A: The implications of this study for clinical practice include the importance of mastery of knowledge about dental anomalies, the use of radiography in the diagnosis and treatment of dental anomalies, and the need for routine training and seminars on the latest developments in the fields of radiography and dental anomalies.

Q: What are the recommendations for future research?

A: The recommendations for future research include investigating the impact of educational interventions on the knowledge and skills of clinical registrar students regarding dental anomalies, and investigating the use of radiography in the diagnosis and treatment of dental anomalies in clinical practice.

Q: What are the implications of this study for education and practice?

A: The implications of this study for education and practice include the need to strengthen the curriculum related to radiography and handling of dental anomalies in educational institutions, and the need for routine training and seminars on the latest developments in the fields of radiography and dental anomalies.

Q: What are the future directions for research in this area?

A: The future directions for research in this area include investigating the impact of educational interventions on the knowledge and skills of clinical registrar students regarding dental anomalies, and investigating the use of radiography in the diagnosis and treatment of dental anomalies in clinical practice.

Q: What are the conclusions of this study?

A: The conclusions of this study are that the knowledge of clinical registrar students regarding dental anomalies using radiography techniques is quite good, with a good category reaching 57.5%. However, there is still room for improvement, and educational institutions should strengthen the curriculum related to radiography and handling of dental anomalies.