Investigate the effect of different types of angkur on the behavior of low quality concrete structures

Oct 13, 2025 by pinkandtrash.com 73 views

Numerical Study and Experimental Study of Concrete Iron Behavior as a Shear Connecting Achor due to Pure Shear in Low Quality Concrete

Introduction

The reinforcement process or retrofitting is a method used to improve existing structures, allowing engineers to strengthen buildings without having to destroy and rebuild. Among the various reinforcement methods, one of which attracts attention in this study is the addition of steel material in the existing concrete column using angkur as a sliding link. The use of this angkur is very diverse, and many manufacturers who create various types of angkur for various applications.

In this study, an experiment was conducted on three concrete samples with FC quality of 21.15 MPa (K-175) and the depth of Angkur (HEF) 90 mm. This test uses concrete iron with variations of distance between angkur, namely 5D, 8D, and 12D. The angkur used is an adhesive anchor type that is tested by gradually push-out loads to reach the maximum strength of the jack, which is 20 tons.

Background and Literature Review

The use of angkur as a shear connecting anchor has been widely studied in recent years. Angkur is a type of anchor that is used to connect two or more structural elements together, and it is commonly used in construction projects to improve the strength and durability of buildings. However, the use of angkur in low quality concrete structures is still a topic of debate among engineers and researchers.

Previous studies have shown that the quality of concrete has a significant impact on the behavior of angkur. Low quality concrete is more prone to deformation and cracking, which can affect the performance of angkur. In addition, the distance between angkur also plays a crucial role in determining the strength and durability of the structure.

Experimental Methodology

The experimental method used in this study is a push-out test, which is a type of test that is commonly used to evaluate the performance of angkur. The test was conducted on three concrete samples with FC quality of 21.15 MPa (K-175) and the depth of Angkur (HEF) 90 mm. The angkur used is an adhesive anchor type that is tested by gradually push-out loads to reach the maximum strength of the jack, which is 20 tons.

The test was conducted in a controlled environment, and the results were recorded using a data logger. The displacement and load were measured using a displacement sensor and a load cell, respectively. The test was repeated three times for each sample to ensure the accuracy of the results.

Testing and Analysis Results

The experimental results show that low quality concrete produces greater deformation and cracks compared to high quality concrete. This phenomenon is important to note, because it shows that the quality of concrete greatly affects the strength and durability of the structure. In addition, testing also reveals the uniformity of the displacement between the Angkur on the left and right, which shows that the effect of load distribution on the public can affect overall performance.

Of the three samples, the largest deformation was recorded in a sample 1 with a more dense inter -angkur distance, reaching 12.27 mm. Sample 2 recorded a deformation of 12.04 mm, while sample 3 with the farthest distance showed a deformation of 10.87 mm. The existence of uniformity in each test shows that the placement and distance of angkur has a significant impact on shear connecting behavior. Different deformations are also seen in angkur that is placed vertically; The biggest deformation occurs in the top angkur, and gradually decreases to the bottom.

Visually, the difference in cracks around the angkur is very clear, especially in sample 1 which is damaged more severe compared to samples 2 and 3. From the test results, sample 3 with the greatest angkur distance produces the highest shear strength, which is 16.25 kN, followed By sample 2 with 13.33 kN, and sample 1 with 10 kN. Nevertheless, the average shear strength of the results of this experiment was lower than the value required according to the Etag-001 equation, which reached 20.71 KN.

Discussion and Conclusion

The conclusion of this study confirms the importance of the design and placement of angkur in low quality concrete structures. The quality of concrete and distance between angkur play a crucial role in determining the strength and durability of the structure. This finding can be a useful reference for civilian and professional engineers in retrofitting the existing structures, so they can design a more efficient and safe system.

However, the results of this study also show that the average shear strength of the results of this experiment was lower than the value required according to the Etag-001 equation. This suggests that further research is needed to explore more effective and sustainable strengthening methods, especially in facing increasingly complex structural challenges.

Recommendation for Future Research

Based on the results of this study, the following recommendations are made for future research:

Investigate the effect of different types of angkur on the behavior of low quality concrete structures: This study used an adhesive anchor type of angkur, but other types of angkur may have different effects on the behavior of low quality concrete structures.
Explore the use of different materials for angkur: This study used steel as the material for angkur, but other materials such as fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) may have different effects on the behavior of low quality concrete structures.
Investigate the effect of different loading conditions on the behavior of low quality concrete structures: This study used a push-out test to evaluate the performance of angkur, but other loading conditions such as bending and torsion may have different effects on the behavior of low quality concrete structures.

Limitation of the Study

This study has several limitations that should be noted:

Limited sample size: This study used only three concrete samples, which may not be representative of all low quality concrete structures.
Limited testing conditions: This study used a push-out test to evaluate the performance of angkur, but other testing conditions such as bending and torsion may have different effects on the behavior of low quality concrete structures.
Limited analysis: This study only analyzed the displacement and load of the angkur, but other parameters such as strain and stress may also be important in evaluating the performance of angkur.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study confirms the importance of the design and placement of angkur in low quality concrete structures. The quality of concrete and distance between angkur play a crucial role in determining the strength and durability of the structure. This finding can be a useful reference for civilian and professional engineers in retrofitting the existing structures, so they can design a more efficient and safe system. However, further research is needed to explore more effective and sustainable strengthening methods, especially in facing increasingly complex structural challenges.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Numerical Study and Experimental Study of Concrete Iron Behavior as a Shear Connecting Achor due to Pure Shear in Low Quality Concrete

Q: What is the purpose of this study?

A: The purpose of this study is to investigate the behavior of concrete iron as a shear connecting anchor due to pure shear in low quality concrete. The study aims to provide a better understanding of the effects of concrete quality and angkur distance on the strength and durability of the structure.

Q: What is the significance of this study?

A: This study is significant because it provides a better understanding of the behavior of concrete iron as a shear connecting anchor in low quality concrete. The study's findings can be used to improve the design and placement of angkur in low quality concrete structures, which can lead to safer and more efficient structures.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The limitations of this study include:

Limited sample size: This study used only three concrete samples, which may not be representative of all low quality concrete structures.
Limited testing conditions: This study used a push-out test to evaluate the performance of angkur, but other testing conditions such as bending and torsion may have different effects on the behavior of low quality concrete structures.
Limited analysis: This study only analyzed the displacement and load of the angkur, but other parameters such as strain and stress may also be important in evaluating the performance of angkur.

Q: What are the implications of this study?

A: The implications of this study are:

The quality of concrete and distance between angkur play a crucial role in determining the strength and durability of the structure.
The design and placement of angkur in low quality concrete structures should be carefully considered to ensure the safety and efficiency of the structure.
Further research is needed to explore more effective and sustainable strengthening methods, especially in facing increasingly complex structural challenges.

Q: What are the recommendations for future research?

A: The recommendations for future research are:

Investigate the effect of different types of angkur on the behavior of low quality concrete structures.
Explore the use of different materials for angkur.
Investigate the effect of different loading conditions on the behavior of low quality concrete structures.

Q: What are the potential applications of this study?

A: The potential applications of this study are:

Retrofitting existing structures to improve their strength and durability.
Designing new structures that are more efficient and safe.
Developing more effective and sustainable strengthening methods for low quality concrete structures.

Q: What are the potential benefits of this study?

A: The potential benefits of this study are:

Improved safety and efficiency of structures.
Reduced costs associated with repairing and replacing damaged structures.
Increased confidence in the design and placement of angkur in low quality concrete structures.

Q: What are the potential challenges of this study?

A: The potential challenges of this study are:

Limited funding and resources for further research.
Difficulty in replicating the results of this study in different environments and conditions.
Potential for conflicting results and opinions among researchers and engineers.

Q: What are the potential future directions of this study?

A: The potential future directions of this study are:

Investigating the effect of different types of angkur on the behavior of low quality concrete structures.
Exploring the use of different materials for angkur.
Investigating the effect of different loading conditions on the behavior of low quality concrete structures.

Q: What are the potential implications for practice?

A: The potential implications for practice are:

Improved design and placement of angkur in low quality concrete structures.
Increased confidence in the safety and efficiency of structures.
Reduced costs associated with repairing and replacing damaged structures.

Q: What are the potential implications for policy?

A: The potential implications for policy are:

Development of new regulations and guidelines for the design and placement of angkur in low quality concrete structures.
Increased funding and resources for research and development of more effective and sustainable strengthening methods.
Improved public awareness and education about the importance of proper design and placement of angkur in low quality concrete structures.