Most Dominant Translation Strategy

Oct 13, 2025 by pinkandtrash.com 139 views

Analysis of Translation Strategies and Levels of Readability of Texts to Unravel the Tangled Thread in Sibolangit

Introduction

The process of translation is a complex and multifaceted task that requires careful consideration of various factors, including the source language, target language, cultural context, and reader's level of education. In this study, we aim to explore the translation strategies used in translating the text "Consistent in Loosening Tangled Thread in Sibolangit" into Indonesian, and to measure the level of readability of the translation text. The study uses a descriptive qualitative approach with document analysis as its main method.

Methodology

The source text consists of 161 sentences and 3,527 words in English, while the translation text has 161 sentences and 3,158 words in Indonesian. The analysis of the text shows the existence of eight translation strategies applied:

Translation Strategies

Loans (Borrowing): 7.45%. This strategy is used to borrow words or phrases from the source language without making adjustments. For example, the word "tangled" is borrowed from the source language and used in the translation text without any changes.
Kalque: 9.32%. This strategy uses the form of source language literally, but is converted into a target language form. For example, the phrase "loosening tangled thread" is used in the source language and translated into Indonesian as "mengurai benang yang terikat".
Literal Translation (Literal Translation): 10.56%. This strategy translates each word literally without regard to context. For example, the phrase "consistent in loosening tangled thread" is translated literally into Indonesian as "konsisten dalam mengurai benang yang terikat".
Transposition: 13.04%. This strategy changes the order of words or phrases in sentences to adjust to target language rules. For example, the sentence "The thread is tangled" is translated into Indonesian as "Benang yang terikat".
Modulation: 18.01%. This strategy changes the perspective or way of delivery in the target language. For example, the sentence "The thread is tangled" is translated into Indonesian as "Benang yang terikat, sehingga perlu diurai".
Adaptation: 10.56%. This strategy adjusts the text to the cultural and social context of the target reader. For example, the phrase "loosening tangled thread" is translated into Indonesian as "mengurai benang yang terikat" to take into account the cultural context of the target reader.
Functional Mature: 16.77%. This strategy is looking for equivalent words or phrases that have the same function in the target language. For example, the phrase "loosening tangled thread" is translated into Indonesian as "mengurai benang yang terikat" to find equivalent words or phrases.
Descriptive Mountains: 14.29%. This strategy uses a description to translate words or phrases that do not have direct equivalents in the target language. For example, the phrase "loosening tangled thread" is translated into Indonesian as "mengurai benang yang terikat" to provide a description of the process.

Most Dominant Translation Strategy

The modulation strategy is the most dominant in the process of translating the text "Seregly to unravel the tangled thread in Sibolangit." This strategy is used to change the perspective or way of delivery in the target language, which is essential in translating complex texts like the one in this study.

Level of Readability

The analysis of the level of readability using the FRY chart shows that the translation text is in the "difficult" category. The analysis shows the readability rate in the "17" area, which means it is above the number 11, which is the threshold for the "difficult" category.

Readability Rate

Although it is categorized as a difficult text, this level of readability is considered in accordance with the target of the reader, namely the Bappeda Deli Serdang civil servants who are predominantly educated S1 and S2. The translation text is designed to be understood by this target audience, and the level of readability is considered suitable for their level of education.

Conclusion

The translation process must be carried out carefully and accurately to produce translation text with an appropriate and easy to understand readability. Lack of disorganization in the translation process can result in distortion of meaning and loss of original meaning from the source text. This study highlights the importance of considering the translation strategies and level of readability in the translation process to produce high-quality translation texts.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

The translation process should be carried out carefully and accurately to produce translation text with an appropriate and easy to understand readability.
The translation strategies used should be considered in accordance with the target language, cultural context, and reader's level of education.
The level of readability of the translation text should be measured using the FRY chart to ensure that it is suitable for the target audience.
The translation text should be designed to be understood by the target audience, and the level of readability should be considered in accordance with their level of education.

Limitations

This study has several limitations, including:

The study only analyzed one translation text, which may not be representative of all translation texts.
The study only used one translation strategy, which may not be representative of all translation strategies.
The study only measured the level of readability using the FRY chart, which may not be the only measure of readability.

Future Research Directions

Future research directions include:

Analyzing multiple translation texts to determine the most common translation strategies used.
Using multiple translation strategies to determine the most effective strategy for translating complex texts.
Measuring the level of readability using multiple measures to determine the most accurate measure of readability.

References

[List of references cited in the study]

Note: The references should be listed in a separate section at the end of the article.
Q&A: Analysis of Translation Strategies and Levels of Readability of Texts to Unravel the Tangled Thread in Sibolangit

Q: What is the purpose of this study?

A: The purpose of this study is to explore the translation strategies used in translating the text "Consistent in Loosening Tangled Thread in Sibolangit" into Indonesian, and to measure the level of readability of the translation text.

Q: What are the eight translation strategies used in this study?

A: The eight translation strategies used in this study are:

Loans (Borrowing): 7.45%. This strategy is used to borrow words or phrases from the source language without making adjustments.
Kalque: 9.32%. This strategy uses the form of source language literally, but is converted into a target language form.
Literal Translation (Literal Translation): 10.56%. This strategy translates each word literally without regard to context.
Transposition: 13.04%. This strategy changes the order of words or phrases in sentences to adjust to target language rules.
Modulation: 18.01%. This strategy changes the perspective or way of delivery in the target language.
Adaptation: 10.56%. This strategy adjusts the text to the cultural and social context of the target reader.
Functional Mature: 16.77%. This strategy is looking for equivalent words or phrases that have the same function in the target language.
Descriptive Mountains: 14.29%. This strategy uses a description to translate words or phrases that do not have direct equivalents in the target language.

Q: Which translation strategy is the most dominant in this study?

A: The modulation strategy is the most dominant in this study, used in 18.01% of the translation text.

Q: What is the level of readability of the translation text?

A: The analysis of the level of readability using the FRY chart shows that the translation text is in the "difficult" category.

Q: Why is the level of readability of the translation text considered "difficult"?

A: The level of readability of the translation text is considered "difficult" because it has a readability rate of 17, which is above the threshold of 11 for the "difficult" category.

Q: Who is the target audience for the translation text?

A: The target audience for the translation text is the Bappeda Deli Serdang civil servants who are predominantly educated S1 and S2.

Q: Why is the level of readability of the translation text considered suitable for the target audience?

A: The level of readability of the translation text is considered suitable for the target audience because it is designed to be understood by them, and the level of readability is in accordance with their level of education.

Q: What are the implications of this study for translation practice?

A: The implications of this study for translation practice are that the translation process must be carried out carefully and accurately to produce translation text with an appropriate and easy to understand readability. Lack of disorganization in the translation process can result in distortion of meaning and loss of original meaning from the source text.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The limitations of this study are that it only analyzed one translation text, which may not be representative of all translation texts, and it only used one translation strategy, which may not be representative of all translation strategies.

Q: What are the future research directions for this study?

A: The future research directions for this study are to analyze multiple translation texts to determine the most common translation strategies used, to use multiple translation strategies to determine the most effective strategy for translating complex texts, and to measure the level of readability using multiple measures to determine the most accurate measure of readability.

Q: What are the references cited in this study?

A: The references cited in this study are listed in a separate section at the end of the article.

Note: The references should be listed in a separate section at the end of the article.