Responsibility of Management

Oct 13, 2025 by pinkandtrash.com 84 views

The Effect of Performance of Members of the Community Self-Agency for the Implementation of Urban Poverty Reduction Programs

Study on the Implementation of P2KP in Dalu X A Village, Tg. Morawa

Introduction

Urban poverty is a significant issue in many regions around the world, including Indonesia. In Dalu X A Village, Tg. Morawa, the implementation of the Urban Poverty Reduction Program (P2KP) is a crucial step in alleviating poverty in the region. The Community Self-Agency (BKM) plays a central role in the implementation of P2KP, and the performance of BKM members is a critical factor in determining the success of the program. This study aims to measure the performance of BKM members in Dalu X A Village and evaluate its effect on the implementation of P2KP.

The Role of Community Self-Agency (BKM) in Urban Poverty Reduction

The Community Self-Agency (BKM) is a community-based organization that plays a crucial role in the implementation of P2KP. BKM members are individuals who are trusted by the community to run the P2KP program. The performance of BKM members is not only a measure of results but also an indicator of how effective BKM can carry out their duties in tackling poverty problems. There are several indicators that become a reference in measuring the performance of BKM members, including:

Responsibility of Management: The extent to which the BKM management carries out their responsibilities in implementing the program.
Management Responsiveness: The ability of BKM management to respond to the needs and complaints of the community.
Management Accountability: Transparency and accountability of the management in the use of resources and program funds.

Methodology

This study used a simple random sampling technique to select 72 people who received P2KP assistance and 1 BKM coordinator for additional information. The research aimed to measure the performance of BKM members in Dalu X A Village and evaluate its effect on the implementation of P2KP.

Results

The results of the study showed that the performance of BKM Mandiri members in Dalu X A Village is quite good. The majority of respondents claimed to be satisfied with the performance of BKM members, who showed that they had carried out their duties quite well. However, even so, there are still some deficiencies that need to be improved so that P2KP goals can be achieved optimally.

Analysis

Further analysis shows that the improvement of the performance of BKM members has a significant influence on the implementation of P2KP, with a contribution of 39%. This means that if BKM members can improve their performance, then the positive impact on poverty reduction programs can be felt greater by the community. Therefore, it is essential for BKM members to continue to improve the quality of service and program implementation, both through training, periodic evaluation, and increasing community participation in the decision-making process.

Conclusion

The performance of BKM members in Dalu X A Village has a very important role in the success of the implementation of urban poverty reduction programs. By improving performance, BKM will not only meet the expectations of the community but also strengthen the positive impact of government programs in reducing poverty in the area. Therefore, it is crucial for BKM members to continue to improve their performance and work together with the community to achieve the goals of P2KP.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

BKM members should continue to improve their performance by attending training and periodic evaluation.
Community participation in the decision-making process should be increased to ensure that the needs and complaints of the community are addressed.
The management of BKM should be transparent and accountable in the use of resources and program funds.
The government should provide support and resources to BKM members to enable them to improve their performance and achieve the goals of P2KP.

Limitations

This study has several limitations, including:

The sample size was limited to 72 people who received P2KP assistance and 1 BKM coordinator.
The study only focused on the performance of BKM members in Dalu X A Village and did not consider other factors that may influence the implementation of P2KP.
The study did not provide a comprehensive analysis of the impact of BKM performance on the implementation of P2KP.

Future Research Directions

Future research should aim to:

Conduct a comprehensive analysis of the impact of BKM performance on the implementation of P2KP.
Investigate the factors that influence the performance of BKM members.
Develop a model to predict the performance of BKM members and the impact of their performance on the implementation of P2KP.

References

[List of references cited in the study]

Appendix

[Appendix containing additional information, such as tables, figures, and questionnaires used in the study]
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Effect of Performance of Members of the Community Self-Agency for the Implementation of Urban Poverty Reduction Programs

Q: What is the Community Self-Agency (BKM) and its role in urban poverty reduction?

A: The Community Self-Agency (BKM) is a community-based organization that plays a crucial role in the implementation of urban poverty reduction programs. BKM members are individuals who are trusted by the community to run the program and are responsible for carrying out their duties in tackling poverty problems.

Q: What are the indicators of performance of BKM members?

A: The performance of BKM members is measured using several indicators, including:

Responsibility of Management: The extent to which the BKM management carries out their responsibilities in implementing the program.
Management Responsiveness: The ability of BKM management to respond to the needs and complaints of the community.
Management Accountability: Transparency and accountability of the management in the use of resources and program funds.

Q: What is the significance of BKM performance in the implementation of P2KP?

A: The performance of BKM members has a significant influence on the implementation of P2KP, with a contribution of 39%. This means that if BKM members can improve their performance, then the positive impact on poverty reduction programs can be felt greater by the community.

Q: What are the recommendations for BKM members to improve their performance?

A: BKM members should continue to improve their performance by attending training and periodic evaluation. Community participation in the decision-making process should be increased to ensure that the needs and complaints of the community are addressed. The management of BKM should be transparent and accountable in the use of resources and program funds.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This study has several limitations, including:

The sample size was limited to 72 people who received P2KP assistance and 1 BKM coordinator.
The study only focused on the performance of BKM members in Dalu X A Village and did not consider other factors that may influence the implementation of P2KP.
The study did not provide a comprehensive analysis of the impact of BKM performance on the implementation of P2KP.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research should aim to:

Conduct a comprehensive analysis of the impact of BKM performance on the implementation of P2KP.
Investigate the factors that influence the performance of BKM members.
Develop a model to predict the performance of BKM members and the impact of their performance on the implementation of P2KP.

Q: What are the implications of this study for policymakers and practitioners?

A: This study highlights the importance of BKM performance in the implementation of P2KP and suggests that policymakers and practitioners should prioritize the improvement of BKM performance to achieve the goals of the program. This can be achieved by providing training and support to BKM members, increasing community participation in the decision-making process, and ensuring transparency and accountability in the use of resources and program funds.

Q: What are the potential applications of this study?

A: This study has potential applications in the fields of urban poverty reduction, community development, and social work. The findings of this study can be used to inform the development of policies and programs aimed at reducing poverty and improving the well-being of communities.