Revealing the search behavior of Fis Unimed Student Information in the digital age

Oct 13, 2025 by pinkandtrash.com 149 views

Revealing the search behavior of Fis Unimed Student Information in the digital age

The digital era has revolutionized the way we access and utilize information. The widespread availability of digital information sources, such as the internet, social media, and other digital platforms, has transformed the way we search for and utilize information. However, how do students use these digital information sources? This study aims to reveal the search behavior of information on the Faculty of Social Sciences Students (FIS) Medan State University (Unimed) in utilizing digital information sources.

Methodology

This study uses a quantitative descriptive method with proportionate stratified random sampling techniques. Data was collected through a questionnaire distributed to STRATA I FIS UNIMED students. The data analysis is carried out using an analytical framework that includes five components: identifying information needs, deciding to find information, implementing information discovery strategies, selecting information, and using information.

Identify information needs

The results showed that the majority of FIS Unimed students (38%) wrote important points regarding the information needed before starting the search. As many as 48% of students connect information or material to be sought, while 44% formulate the topic of the problem or write down relevant concepts to the topic you want to find. This shows that most students have understood the importance of identifying specific information needs before conducting a search.

Decided to find information

In deciding to find information, 60% of FIS Unimed students select the internet as the main source of information. This shows that the internet is the most easily accessible source of information and is considered up-to-date by students. In addition to the internet, 42% of students also ask experts in the scientific field related to their information needs.

Applying information discovery strategies

This study found that FIS Unimed students tend to use more efficient information search strategies. As many as 47% of students use the Boolean Logic (and, OR) operator in the search for information on the internet. Meanwhile, 37% of students limit file types (PDF, Word, HTML) in searching for information on the internet. In addition, 45% of students use the author's name as a keyword, 42% use the subject/theme, and 44% use the title as keywords in searching for information in search engines.

Selecting information

The information selection process is an important step to ensure that the information obtained is relevant and credible. As many as 46% of FIS Unimed students compared the source of information obtained to ensure the relevance of information. Then, 45% of students examine accountability and credibility of information sources, while 44% of students re-read the information chosen to ensure their compatibility.

Using information

The final step in the information search process is to use the information obtained. FIS UNIMED students (44%) process the information obtained in accordance with the purpose of the search. As many as 53% of students make information obtained as a reference material in the development of the treasury of science. As many as 48% of students said they often find information that suits their needs.

Conclusions and Recommendations

Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that FIS Unimed students are generally able to pass the stages of the information search process in utilizing digital information sources. However, there are still some weaknesses, such as lack of expertise in utilizing more effective information search strategies, especially the use of Boolean Logic operators.

The recommendation given is that FIS Unimed students can improve their ability to identify specific information needs, as well as implementing more efficient information search strategies. This increase can be done through training, seminars, and workshops on digital literacy and information search strategies.

Increasing the ability of students in utilizing digital information sources will have a positive impact on the teaching and learning process at FIS Unimed. This will help students in obtaining relevant, accurate, and credible information, so that they can support effective learning processes and improve the quality of learning in the future.

Implications for Teaching and Learning

The findings of this study have significant implications for teaching and learning at FIS Unimed. The study highlights the importance of digital literacy and information search strategies in supporting effective learning processes. Therefore, it is recommended that FIS Unimed incorporates digital literacy and information search strategies into its curriculum.

Limitations of the Study

This study has some limitations. The study only focuses on FIS Unimed students, and the results may not be generalizable to other students. Additionally, the study only uses a quantitative approach, and a qualitative approach may provide more in-depth insights into the information search behavior of FIS Unimed students.

Future Research Directions

This study provides a foundation for future research on information search behavior in utilizing digital information sources. Future studies can explore the information search behavior of students in other disciplines, as well as the impact of digital literacy and information search strategies on teaching and learning.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study reveals the search behavior of FIS Unimed students in utilizing digital information sources. The study highlights the importance of digital literacy and information search strategies in supporting effective learning processes. The findings of this study have significant implications for teaching and learning at FIS Unimed, and it is recommended that FIS Unimed incorporates digital literacy and information search strategies into its curriculum.

References

[1] [Author's Name]. (Year). Title of the study. Journal/Conference Proceedings.
[2] [Author's Name]. (Year). Title of the study. Journal/Conference Proceedings.
[3] [Author's Name]. (Year). Title of the study. Journal/Conference Proceedings.

Note: The references should be in a standard format, such as APA or MLA, and should include the author's name, year of publication, title of the study, and journal/conference proceedings.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the main objective of this study?

A: The main objective of this study is to analyze the information search behavior of students in the Faculty of Social Sciences Unimed in utilizing digital information sources.

Q: What methodology was used in this study?

A: This study used a quantitative descriptive method with proportionate stratified random sampling techniques. Data was collected through a questionnaire distributed to STRATA I FIS UNIMED students.

Q: What are the five components of the analytical framework used in this study?

A: The five components of the analytical framework used in this study are:

Identifying information needs
Deciding to find information
Implementing information discovery strategies
Selecting information
Using information

Q: What percentage of FIS Unimed students wrote important points regarding the information needed before starting the search?

A: 38% of FIS Unimed students wrote important points regarding the information needed before starting the search.

Q: What percentage of FIS Unimed students select the internet as the main source of information?

A: 60% of FIS Unimed students select the internet as the main source of information.

Q: What percentage of FIS Unimed students use the Boolean Logic (and, OR) operator in the search for information on the internet?

A: 47% of FIS Unimed students use the Boolean Logic (and, OR) operator in the search for information on the internet.

Q: What percentage of FIS Unimed students compared the source of information obtained to ensure the relevance of information?

A: 46% of FIS Unimed students compared the source of information obtained to ensure the relevance of information.

Q: What percentage of FIS Unimed students process the information obtained in accordance with the purpose of the search?

A: 44% of FIS Unimed students process the information obtained in accordance with the purpose of the search.

Q: What are the implications of this study for teaching and learning at FIS Unimed?

A: The study highlights the importance of digital literacy and information search strategies in supporting effective learning processes. Therefore, it is recommended that FIS Unimed incorporates digital literacy and information search strategies into its curriculum.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This study has some limitations. The study only focuses on FIS Unimed students, and the results may not be generalizable to other students. Additionally, the study only uses a quantitative approach, and a qualitative approach may provide more in-depth insights into the information search behavior of FIS Unimed students.

Q: What are the future research directions based on this study?

A: This study provides a foundation for future research on information search behavior in utilizing digital information sources. Future studies can explore the information search behavior of students in other disciplines, as well as the impact of digital literacy and information search strategies on teaching and learning.

Conclusion

This Q&A article provides answers to frequently asked questions related to the analysis of information search behavior in utilizing digital information sources, as presented in the case study of student Faculty of Social Sciences Unimed. The study highlights the importance of digital literacy and information search strategies in supporting effective learning processes, and provides a foundation for future research on information search behavior in utilizing digital information sources.

References

[1] [Author's Name]. (Year). Title of the study. Journal/Conference Proceedings.
[2] [Author's Name]. (Year). Title of the study. Journal/Conference Proceedings.
[3] [Author's Name]. (Year). Title of the study. Journal/Conference Proceedings.